Join every day information updates from CleanTechnica on e mail. Or comply with us on Google Information!
Lazard lately launched its latests evaluation of LCOE (levelized value of vitality) for various energy sources. As has been the case for the previous a number of years, photo voltaic and wind energy stay extremely aggressive (aka low-cost). Nevertheless, estimates on the excessive finish of the worth vary have come down a bit whereas estimates on the low finish of the worth vary have risen a bit of for the primary time in years ever.
As you may see within the chart above, which visualizes model 17 of Lazard’s value of vitality comparability throughout the electrical energy sector’s essential energy sources, utility-scale solar energy and onshore wind energy are by far the most cost effective sources for brand new electrical energy technology.
Naturally, as everybody is aware of, photo voltaic and wind energy have comparatively low capability elements, and making them actually helpful and similar to a fossil fuel energy plant in utility means including stationary vitality storage as properly. Including in storage, onshore wind energy has the identical low value as mixed cycle fuel energy vegetation, and utility-scale photo voltaic just isn’t far off. In fact, if the grid wants all of that electrical energy when the solar is shining and the wind is blowing, these cheaper energy vegetation with out storage are nonetheless the most cost effective new electrical energy you will get.
Offshore wind energy can also be creeping right into a extra aggressive place. However, let’s be trustworthy, it’s nonetheless significantly extra expensive on the low finish than even onshore wind energy mixed with vitality storage.
Fossil fuel energy vegetation are clearly nonetheless aggressive on a LCOE foundation — being allowed to get away with extreme methane leaks, in fact, that add a big social value not included within the LCOE.
Coal and nuclear energy are principally priced out of the market now. However, collectively, they bring about us to 1 closing attention-grabbing level for this text. Lazard contains some little diamonds in its chart for additional issues it’s inspecting. The yellow ones are indicating working prices alone, assuming an already constructed energy plant. As Lazard places it: “Reflects the average of the high and low LCOE marginal cost of operating fully depreciated gas peaking, gas combined cycle, coal and nuclear facilities, inclusive of decommissioning costs for nuclear facilities. Analysis assumes that the salvage value for a decommissioned gas or coal asset is equivalent to its decommissioning and site restoration costs. Inputs are derived from a benchmark of operating gas, coal and nuclear assets across the U.S. Capacity factors, fuel, variable and fixed operating expenses are based on upper- and lower-quartile estimates derived from Lazard’s research.” One attention-grabbing factor right here is that this determine for combined-cycle fossil fuel energy vegetation and nuclear energy vegetation continues to be fairly low, however onshore wind and utility-scale photo voltaic (with out storage) are literally decrease already on the low finish. Within the case of coal energy (and fuel peaking vegetation), the determine is sort of excessive. For this reason we’ve seen so many coal plant closures lately, and can see extra within the subsequent few years. Keep tuned.
Relating to some extent famous on the prime — high-end estimates for photo voltaic and wind energy LCOE coming down whereas low-end estimates go up — that was the matter that Lazard determined to focus on and focus on earlier than any others in its govt abstract. Right here’s what Lazard wrote: “Despite high end LCOE declines for selected renewable energy technologies, the low ends of our LCOE have increased for the first time ever, driven by the persistence of certain cost pressures (e.g., high interest rates, etc.). These two phenomena result in tighter LCOE ranges (offsetting the significant range expansion observed last year) and relatively stable LCOE averages year-over-year. The persistence of elevated costs continues to reinforce the central theme noted above—sizable and well-capitalized companies that can take advantage of supply chain and other economies of scale, and that have strong balance sheet support to weather fluctuations in the macro environment, will continue leading the build-out of new renewable energy assets.”
There’s extra from the Lazard report to drag out and report on, however this was a superb place to start out on the core findings of the evaluation as they concern energy technology applied sciences, significantly photo voltaic and wind energy.
Associated story: Renewable Power Supplies 99% of New Producing Capability in Each April & YTD
Hat tip to “earwig” for sharing the brand new Lazard report with us and pushing for some protection.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Need to promote? Need to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Speak podcast? Contact us right here.
Newest CleanTechnica.TV Movies
CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage right here.