Ongoing Efforts to Restrict Use of Chinese language Drone Expertise within the U.S. Intensify
Chairman John Moolenaar (R-MI) and Rating Member Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) of the Home Choose Committee on the Strategic Competitors Between america and the Chinese language Communist Social gathering have taken a brand new step of their ongoing efforts to handle nationwide safety issues associated to Chinese language drone know-how. In letters to Anzu Robotics’ CEO, Randall Warnas, and U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, the lawmakers demanded readability on Anzu’s relationship with SZ DJI Expertise Co., Ltd. (DJI), the Chinese language drone firm that holds roughly 80% of the worldwide drone market share.
Issues Over Anzu’s Relationship with DJI
Of their correspondence to Anzu’s CEO, Moolenaar and Krishnamoorthi raised issues about Anzu’s enterprise practices, citing safety researchers who found that Anzu’s Raptor T drone is actually a rebranded DJI Mavic 3. The letter acknowledged, “[S]ecurity researchers have confirmed that Anzu’s Raptor T is essentially a DJI Mavic 3 painted green, with its remote control and application all running on DJI technology.”
The lawmakers questioned whether or not Anzu is performing as a “passthrough company” for DJI, aimed toward circumventing U.S. restrictions on DJI merchandise.
The letter questions the unconventional nature of the DJI-Anzu relationship. Anzu claims that DJI offers industry-leading drone know-how via a license that permits Anzu to switch and manufacture the know-how with out sharing royalties or possession, and with no requirement to report buyer information. The lawmakers remarked, “Given these facts, it is hard to understand the business rationale for DJI to enter into this relationship aside from using it as a passthrough to circumvent legal restrictions (current and prospective) placed on its products.”
Questions for Anzu Robotics
Moolenaar and Krishnamoorthi requested solutions from Warnas on a number of factors, together with the date Anzu first disclosed that its drones have been rebranded DJI merchandise, the character of the contractual preparations with DJI, and particulars of any factories concerned within the manufacturing of Anzu’s drone elements. In addition they requested why Anzu didn’t disclose its relationship with DJI till after public studies confirmed that Anzu was successfully promoting rebranded DJI merchandise.
In keeping with lawmakers ongoing acknowledged issues about Chinese language manufactured drone know-how, the letter additionally questioned the safety of Anzu merchandise, significantly relating to the involvement of DJI in offering technical assist. Lawmakers questioned the steps Anzu has taken to make sure that DJI doesn’t extract information from U.S. clients when offering this assist.
Broader Context and Subsequent Steps
This inquiry comes amidst broader efforts by Congress and federal regulators to counter the nationwide safety menace posed by Chinese language drone firms. DJI has been a focus of those efforts.
Earlier this yr, the Home handed the Countering CCP Drones Act, which might prohibit DJI know-how from accessing U.S. communication networks if signed into legislation. Moreover, DJI has been positioned on varied U.S. authorities restricted lists, together with the Pentagon’s blacklist as a ‘Chinese military company’ and the Commerce Division’s Entity Checklist.
Lawmakers are actually questioning whether or not Anzu Robotics and one other drone maker, Cogito Tech Firm Ltd., are serving as cut-outs for DJI. They’ve requested that the Division of Commerce contemplate steps to handle these issues and take applicable motion towards these firms if mandatory.