Regulators in Japan and South Korea have commenced inquiries into the aggressive implications of increasing generative AI markets of their jurisdictions. This follows considerations the fast-moving market might shortly be dominated by too few gamers, or that rising anti-competitive practices might develop.
In October, the Japan Truthful Commerce Fee started a market examine on generative AI to look at competitors on the infrastructure, mannequin, and utility ranges. As outlined in a dialogue paper, it is going to additionally resolve if adjustments might have to be made to its Antimonopoly Act and competitors coverage.
SEE: US, UK and EU make joint assertion on fostering AI competitors
The Korea Truthful Commerce Fee, in the meantime, launched its personal AI market examine in August of fifty home and worldwide gamers in AI. The KFTC stated it is going to analyse enterprise relations and competitors traits, and preemptively determine points that will undermine competitors and harm customers.
Japan taking a look at AI competitors throughout all layers of know-how
Japan’s competitors regulator is anticipating the native generative AI sector to expertise a 47.2% common annual progress charge between 2023 and 2030. For the correct integration of those applied sciences inside its economic system and society, the regulatory physique says it’s “crucial to maintain a fair and competitive environment” in enterprise.
The infrastructure layer
The JFTC is exploring points such because the highly effective dominance of NVIDIA in GPUs, the variations in coaching information worldwide fashions and Japanese fashions use or have entry to, and the issue for Japanese corporations to carry on to AI expertise experience when up towards the monetary firepower of worldwide gamers.
SEE: AI surge may set off world chip scarcity by 2026
The mannequin layer
Japan factors out that, whereas basic function worldwide LLMs lead in areas similar to inferencing, multilingual competence, and multi-model inputs, homegrown gamers are differentiating on Japanese language efficiency or creating specialist LLM fashions for particular enterprise or trade use instances.
The appliance layer
On the product degree — the place companies are creating functions utilizing both open supply, proprietary, or inner fashions — the JFTC needs to determine what obstacles companies face and what challenges exist in sustaining and selling truthful and free competitors within the generative AI market.
Competitors considerations embody entry to GPUs
Whereas the JFTC has stated it has not made any conclusions relating to market behaviours in generative AI, there have been a lot of areas that it will be utilizing as a foundation for dialogue with market gamers.
Entry restrictions and exclusion of rivals: If a small variety of massive enterprises are in a greater place to accumulate GPUs or information, or if entry to different gamers is restricted, then new market entry alternatives and different aggressive dynamics can be impacted, the JFTC famous.
Self-preferencing an organization’s personal providers: One potential abuse of energy in generative AI fashions may happen when the mannequin’s personal providers seem extra favourably in its inference outcomes over these of competing firms, impacting competitors for services and products available in the market.
Tying service provision to make use of of a mannequin: The JFTC has warned that there could also be issues the place a dominant supplier of a service bundles using its personal generative AI mannequin as a situation of providing that service, thereby impacting competitors amongst generative AI fashions.
Parallel conduct utilizing generative AI: The JFTC has flagged considerations that comparable or equivalent pricing methods might emerge from alignment between underlying information and algorithms being utilized by completely different organisations, resulting in an impression on competitors.
Cornering skilled expertise through partnerships: A technique organisations might search to seize the market’s extremely expert expertise for themselves is by forming partnerships, which the JFTC stated may end in results that have been much like a enterprise switch, attracting competitors consideration.
Korea to look at AI market share focus
Whereas acknowledging generative AI could possibly be a big driver of financial progress, South Korea’s competitors regulator is worried that the capital and compute intensive nature of AI know-how provides rise to competitors considerations. Like Japan, Korea’s announcement notes potential dangers together with:
- A handful of highly effective firms controlling most market share in AI.
- Potential obstacles to entry constructed by lack of entry to key inputs for AI growth.
The Commerce Fee is utilizing provisions in its Monopoly Regulation and Truthful Commerce Act to launch the examine on the key gamers available in the market. The investigation will look at enterprise actions, items and providers inside the AI sector, and any unfair commerce practices, it stated within the assertion saying the examine.
Following the investigation, it expects to take a look at competitors coverage that may help innovation and truthful competitors within the AI trade, and publish an AI Coverage Report by the tip of 2024.
Australia can also be watching generative AI competitors
Australia’s competitors regulator, the Australian Competitors and Client Fee, has additionally indicated it’s watching AI market developments. The tenth report in its Digital Platform Companies Inquiry, attributable to be delivered to the federal government in March 2025, will look at features of generative AI competitors.
The assertion stated: “The ACCC proposes to look at potential competitors points regarding generative AI. These might embody the excessive obstacles to entry available in the market and the potential for giant digital platforms to strengthen and broaden their market energy by the mixing of Giant Language Fashions (LLMs).
ACCC Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb stated the physique is “following recent developments in generative AI closely.”
“Adoption has been extensive, and this technology continues to expand and develop at a rapid pace,” she stated. “Generative AI products and services may present new opportunities, but also new challenges with major implications for our work.”